Amazon EC2 versus rackspace cloud hosting

-
I recently needed to stand up a DB2 server and was going to reach for my trusty rackspace account, but didn't feel like setting up DB2 for an experiment that would only last a few hours.

Instead I turned to amazon. It turns out that amazon has preconfigured images for ubuntu/db2 that you can spin up almost instantaneously. In addition, their security model is a little more robust. Key things they do right from a security perspective (compared to rackspace).

#1 They never send you a root password (via email or otherwise). You must generate a public/private key pair and download the key via https. Assuming you keep your secret key secure, there is minimal (if any) opportunity for someone to steal this key. Even if they hack your amazon account, I'm not sure they could get to your server immediately, even though they certainly could shut it down.

#2 By default you are behind a firewall so that only a minimal set of tcp ports are even open. You need to actually take action before they will allow ssh access to the server.

#3 The root account is locked and cannot log in from a remote location. You MUST log in via a "normal" user (ubuntu on this image) and then switch to root.

All told, it seems like EC2 has got a more secure default setup than Rackspace. I haven't yet compared pricing or service levels on the two, but purely from a security perspective, RackspaceAWS certainly has got it's stuff together.

Comments

Cloud Hosting India said…
Fine comparison. Cloud hosting is considered the hottest and most reliable hosting solution.

cloud hosting india
January 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Please use ANSI-92 SQL Join Syntax

-
Image
Way back in 1992, a standard was published for SQL. In it, the syntax for specifying joins in SQL Database was finally standardized. This was a good thing because (for folks who've been doing this a while), trying to decode the vagaries of how various Databases handled outer joins could drive you bonkers yielding different results depending on the parse order of things in the from and where clauses. Unfortunately, some DBMS vendors took a while to adopt this standard (Oracle didn't support it until 2001), but at this point if you're using a major RDBMS and NOT using it, you're probably mired in a tradition or habit that bears changing. As an example of what I'm describing, here are some examples of what I mean. Old School (no standard syntax + implementation and evaluation of predicates varied by vendor [and query]): select * from customer, order where customer.customer = order.customerid ANSI way (agreed to standard, predicate evaluation has some rules
Read more

the myth of asynchronous JDBC

-
Image
I keep seeing people (especially in the scala/typesafe world) posting about async jdbc libraries. STOP IT! Under the current APIs, async JDBC belongs in a realm with Unicorns, Tiger Squirrels, and 8' spiders. While you might be able to move the blocking operations and queue requests and keep your "main" worker threads from blocking, jdbc is synchronous. At some point, somewhere, there's going to be a thread blocking waiting for a response. It's frustrating to see so many folks hyping this and muddying the waters. Unless you write your own client for a dbms and have a dbms that can multiplex calls over a single connection (or using some other strategy to enable this capability) db access is going to block. It's not impossible to make the calls completely async, but nobody's built it yet. Yes, I know ajdbc is taking a stab at this capability, but even IT uses a thread pool for the blocking calls (be default). Someday we'll have async databa
Read more

The difference between Scalability, Performance, Efficiency, and Concurrency explained

-
I thought I'd give some explanation of the difference between scalability, performance, Efficiency, and concurrency. To make things more accessible (and because I'm watching a cooking show on TV) I'm going to use a baking metaphor to help explain the differences. In our case, the system in question is baking cookies for consumers. Scalability, is how well something responds to adding more resources. If we can double our capacity by doubling the number of resources, we've got linear scalability. In our baking example, if we add more ingredients, we can scale to a larger number of cookies. To contrast with our other metrics, this doesn't actually increase the performance of creating a single cookie (they still take 10 minutes to bake), and the efficiency is the same (we just have more capacity). We also cannot bake more cookies in a fixed time period, but over a larger time period we can produce more cookies. Performance is how fast something can get done, u
Read more