Why windows is useful in the cloud

-
OK, I realize from a previous post that it in a previous post it may seem like I think that windows is completely non-functional in a cloud environment.

Let me back up a little...

From my perspective, running production servers on virtual machines spun up on demand is not useful (yet) with the windows operating system. The windows OS strategy is just not responsive enough to this sort of business requirement (yet).

That having been said, I just finished spinning up a windows 2003 server instance on rackspace... Why? I need to investigate some Active Directory problems we're trying to solve at work right now. I spent 4 hours downloading the massive DVD install image (and a bunch of crazy MS registration stuff) for a 10 day TRIAL version of the OS.

I then went over to my rackspace account (because of a different problem) and realized they could set up the server I needed. I clicked "create server" and they set up a virtual server in 15 minutes. Yes, it costs more to run this server than my Ubuntu instances, but it's only going to run for a couple of hours over the next 2 days so I don't really care.

In short, on-demand virtual windows machines (I'd love some XP/Vista/Windows 7 instances for testing our software hint hint) are a super useful thing and are worth their weight in gold (maybe even platinum), but this doesn't mean it's a good distributed virtual server platform.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Please use ANSI-92 SQL Join Syntax

-
Image
Way back in 1992, a standard was published for SQL. In it, the syntax for specifying joins in SQL Database was finally standardized. This was a good thing because (for folks who've been doing this a while), trying to decode the vagaries of how various Databases handled outer joins could drive you bonkers yielding different results depending on the parse order of things in the from and where clauses. Unfortunately, some DBMS vendors took a while to adopt this standard (Oracle didn't support it until 2001), but at this point if you're using a major RDBMS and NOT using it, you're probably mired in a tradition or habit that bears changing. As an example of what I'm describing, here are some examples of what I mean. Old School (no standard syntax + implementation and evaluation of predicates varied by vendor [and query]): select * from customer, order where customer.customer = order.customerid ANSI way (agreed to standard, predicate evaluation has some rules ...
Read more

The difference between Scalability, Performance, Efficiency, and Concurrency explained

-
I thought I'd give some explanation of the difference between scalability, performance, Efficiency, and concurrency. To make things more accessible (and because I'm watching a cooking show on TV) I'm going to use a baking metaphor to help explain the differences. In our case, the system in question is baking cookies for consumers. Scalability, is how well something responds to adding more resources. If we can double our capacity by doubling the number of resources, we've got linear scalability. In our baking example, if we add more ingredients, we can scale to a larger number of cookies. To contrast with our other metrics, this doesn't actually increase the performance of creating a single cookie (they still take 10 minutes to bake), and the efficiency is the same (we just have more capacity). We also cannot bake more cookies in a fixed time period, but over a larger time period we can produce more cookies. Performance is how fast something can get done, u...
Read more

the myth of asynchronous JDBC

-
Image
I keep seeing people (especially in the scala/typesafe world) posting about async jdbc libraries. STOP IT! Under the current APIs, async JDBC belongs in a realm with Unicorns, Tiger Squirrels, and 8' spiders. While you might be able to move the blocking operations and queue requests and keep your "main" worker threads from blocking, jdbc is synchronous. At some point, somewhere, there's going to be a thread blocking waiting for a response. It's frustrating to see so many folks hyping this and muddying the waters. Unless you write your own client for a dbms and have a dbms that can multiplex calls over a single connection (or using some other strategy to enable this capability) db access is going to block. It's not impossible to make the calls completely async, but nobody's built it yet. Yes, I know ajdbc is taking a stab at this capability, but even IT uses a thread pool for the blocking calls (be default). Someday we'll have async databa...
Read more